Packing the 3"

Talk about ball pumping, stretching, ball enlargement techniques.

Moderator: bigray57

Post Reply
alilnut
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 8:27 am
Location: Washington, DC Area

Packing the 3"

Post by alilnut »

Only if they would stay like this.

Sorry about the size. I didn't have time to import into picture viewer, resize, etc. If somebody knows how to cut out that step, I'd greatly appreciate your sharing. Thanks.
Attachments
DSC00227.JPG
DSC00227.JPG (606.44 KiB) Viewed 5282 times
DSC00229.JPG
DSC00229.JPG (548.41 KiB) Viewed 5282 times
DSC00230.JPG
DSC00230.JPG (499.34 KiB) Viewed 5282 times
DSC00231.JPG
DSC00231.JPG (528.47 KiB) Viewed 5282 times
DSC00232.JPG
DSC00232.JPG (556.71 KiB) Viewed 5282 times
DSC00234.JPG
DSC00234.JPG (582.96 KiB) Viewed 5282 times
alilnut
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 8:27 am
Location: Washington, DC Area

Post by alilnut »

Out of the tube. A Monster will do great justice, I believe. I can't imagine seeing MY balls as big as some on the site. One day.
Attachments
10.jpg
10.jpg (30.34 KiB) Viewed 5242 times
11.jpg
11.jpg (33.4 KiB) Viewed 5242 times
12.jpg
12.jpg (29.14 KiB) Viewed 5242 times
13.jpg
13.jpg (24.22 KiB) Viewed 5242 times
DELETED

Over Sized

Post by DELETED »

DELETED
gerardt
Posts: 1511
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:46 am
Location: texas
Contact:

Post by gerardt »

lilnut,

if u know the shit is not right and gonna take 3-4 years to download, why UPLOAD? its not like our pics have anything to do with the worlds security!

just a cranky old mans thoughts!

jerry 8)
alilnut
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 8:27 am
Location: Washington, DC Area

Post by alilnut »

Hey Guys, I knew the pics would be large, I never considered the "download" time. I guess living in the big city has me spoiled. I don't know anybody who still has dial-up. Sorry. --A
rubberfox
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:15 am
Location: x0|London UK|||||

Post by rubberfox »

Men - give the man a break. Who's got the time to faff around resizing pics to please the high-maintenance/over-demanding viewer?
Alilnut, I loved your pics... so they took a few seconds more to download and needed a bit of left-right scrolling, but all the more interesting for that and well-worth the effort. Nice work. Post some more.

Now come on gents, get with the 21st. century and upgrade to adsl.

fFoxxy
gerardt
Posts: 1511
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:46 am
Location: texas
Contact:

Post by gerardt »

rf,

or who has asked you to pay a membership fee to be here and have the luxury of posting here for free.

bandwidth costs MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!! are u payinin 4 it?????????

i didnt think so,

jerry 8)
egghead
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 3:43 pm
Location: Australia

Post by egghead »

It is a shame, I don't have the hour to download them either. I'm stuck with dial-up as broadband isn't available in this street (although I keep working at Telstra to upgrade their exchange).

To answer your question alilnut, I bet that your camera can be set to take smaller resolution (smaller format) photos. Photos as large as the ones you are taking will be eating up memory in your camera as well as in your PC, looks like over 500KB each instead of 50 to 150KB. The large format is good if you intend to print them off or work with them with photo editing software. But if your only intention is to send them on the web, you should set your camera to 640 x 480 pixels.

egg
ampudev
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:35 pm
Location: Cologne|Germany|Europe
Contact:

Post by ampudev »

to add my 2 cents...

for my screen, my resolution, and my bandwidth the pic size is just perfect. keep on posting like this...
gerardt
Posts: 1511
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:46 am
Location: texas
Contact:

Post by gerardt »

ad,

cool 4 u. if they resize, it will benefit all 4 of us. you me our friends and the site.

jerry 8)
Post Reply