Back to square one - un-pumped
Posted: Sun May 12, 2019 5:18 pm
Hi Folks,
I haven't pumped for the best part of a fortnight now, mostly just to see what my ground state "normal" is (and to check for lumps).
So here are the results: six months ago I did this and measured my sac circumference as 230 mm (9 inches). Measuring circumference today gives me 255 mm (10 inches). Which I am very pleased about but might have more to do with my measuring technique than permanent gains. I chose to wear an Oxballs short neo ball stretcher just to make things easier and will do so in future for this un-pumped measurement. The previous measurement I juggled balls, tape measure and phone without the ball stretcher so it might be a compromised reading and besides which 10 inches of sac sounds better! So I'm taking that as ground zero and all future un-pumped measurements will be done wearing that particular stretcher.
And photos:
And of course I am now back in a 90 mm (3.5 inch) straight tube to get back in the swing of things!
I haven't pumped for the best part of a fortnight now, mostly just to see what my ground state "normal" is (and to check for lumps).
So here are the results: six months ago I did this and measured my sac circumference as 230 mm (9 inches). Measuring circumference today gives me 255 mm (10 inches). Which I am very pleased about but might have more to do with my measuring technique than permanent gains. I chose to wear an Oxballs short neo ball stretcher just to make things easier and will do so in future for this un-pumped measurement. The previous measurement I juggled balls, tape measure and phone without the ball stretcher so it might be a compromised reading and besides which 10 inches of sac sounds better! So I'm taking that as ground zero and all future un-pumped measurements will be done wearing that particular stretcher.
And photos:
And of course I am now back in a 90 mm (3.5 inch) straight tube to get back in the swing of things!