Page 1 of 1

It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster now.

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 12:44 am
by Mike
It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster now.<br><br>Thank God. I've missed this forum.

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 4:39 am
by G-man
Good to have you back, Mike.  :)

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 4:40 am
by Mike
Thanks G-Man. I've always loved this forum & was pissed off a lot when it didn't work.<br><br>For awhile everyone was on the other forum from here, but nobody really posted anything.<br><br>Not like this one.<br><br>I've been on this forum since 1997 & was really disappointed this past year when the site took 2hrs LOL to load a damn picture & 4hrs to post one.<br><br>I'm just glad everything's back to normal.<br>

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 3:46 pm
by G-man
To be candid (and I know this might tick many people off here), I think the board's admin (and I've already e-mailed him about this) should institute some kind of limitation on the size of images that can be posted here, something like no images larger than 800x800 pixels.  I think that would go a long way toward helping keep this place running smoothly.

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:08 pm
by pumpin60
The size of pics are easy to control is you use a simple program like "Thumbsplus" to resize and even sharpen with.  Put out by Cerious Software, http://www.cerious.com/  you can download it and try it out for free for a month before putting out any hard earned cash. I've been using this program now for about 4 years (actually bought it) and love it.  Easy to use.  Sorry about doing a "commercial" but this forum would be fast all the time if pics were kept to say, 640 x 480.  

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:23 pm
by egghead
My camera, a Sony mavica, gives me a choice of image resolutions to choose from. I use 640 x 480 in most cases since I'm not worried about actually printing a large format photo quality image. <br><br>It does allow me to go up to 1000 x 1200 (many new cameras can go way higher than that) but I find that the photo doesn't look that much better on this monitor, at least not enough to warrant the extra storage space that they take up.<br><br>Anyway, to the point...don't all digital cameras allow some choice of resolution before you even snap off a shot? It would eliminate the need to resize.

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:52 am
by b.c.
...

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:06 pm
by germanstretch
bc  very nice cock<br><br>and nice hp...<br><br>show us more that long cock and pump it up....<br><br>gs

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:10 pm
by G-man
Jesus H. Christ, b.c.!!!  :o

Re: It's Mike, I'm back, I see the sights faster n

Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:05 am
by mRuss
Hly fuck BC where have you been the past couple years? :)  Good to see you and your big cock (and your feet!, you always did like to show them both in your pictures)  <br><br>Cheers,<br>Russ.