TetherSpout wrote:The way I see it, cutting a pee hole doesn't enlarge it. It simply obliterates it and moves the opening further down the urethra, which is a tragedy because the urethral orifice, i.e. the meatus, is typically one of the most sensitive areas of the glans when left intact. If you want to retain sensitivity and keep your options open, it is far better to stretch the orifice than to cut it.
How I agree with you! Stretching is a long journey and not for the impatient, the journey and the processes involved form the pleasure, cutting is definitely not the answer.
Since I have a meatotomy, I'd have to say cutting did make my hole bigger. It also changed the shape of my glans (for the better, I think). I do think there are advantages not cutting though, and I occasionally wish I could switch back and forth, but that's impossible. I still don't regret having a meatotomy though. Slicing the urethra in itself may not have been the most relevant factor in taking larger sounds though. I remember forcing open my urethral sphincter, which I'm sure you'll regard as a terrible thing. In hindsight, you may be right, but it was pretty exciting for me at the time. I think of it as the closest thing a man has to a hymen. Mine gave way, and that was the end of that.
In any case, I'd be surprised if I could take a Fr.#34 sound without cutting my urethral opening to some degree. Humans vary so much in what they're capable of. I still view in amazement when a woman can take two fists or a champagne bottle up their vaginas or rectum. Much is lost when they can do that, but it's a fetish activity, so the heart wants what the heart wants.